Filter paper pod packaging machine

ABSTRACT

A filter paper pod packaging machine characterised by the fact that it comprises a polygonal prismatic wheel (P) with an intermittently rotating horizontal axis (R), each flat face (L) of the prism (P) directly incorporating at least one recess (G) matching the size and shape of the pods to be produced.

FIELD OF THE ART

The present invention refers to the engineering of machines for packaging products in filter paper pods. International reference classification B65b.

STATE OF THE ART

The use of filter paper pods to package individual portions of ground products is well known in the art. Pods containing ground coffee of varying particle size are widely used. All the machines known up to now pose specific problems, especially as regards control over the degree of compacting. Moreover, the presently available machines do not perform reliably and are incapable of maintaining the high output rates demanded by the market. The problem to be solved, therefore, is to produce economical and reliable pods at a fast rate and with constant precision in terms both of the product weight per packaged dose and its degree of compactness, also where the particle size is not homogeneous.

The pod packaging machine as envisaged in the present invention solves all the above-described problems and is highly economical both to manufacture and to operate in an industrial setting.

Besides occupying a minimal surface area, the machine of the present invention has a highly compact en bloc structure.

DESCRIPTION

The invention will now be explained referring to the appended drawings, which serve solely illustrative purposes and in no way limit the scope of the invention itself.

FIG. 1 is a schematic axonometric representation of a carousel with an intermittently rotating horizontal axis (R) and a circumference shaped as a polygonal prism (P) whose flat faces (L) have recesses which are directly impressed in the surface (G) and geometrically match the shape and size of the pods that will be made. It is possible to note the presence of twin recesses (G) on each face of the prism.

FIG. 1 bis is a schematic axonometric representation of a carousel with an intermittently rotating horizontal axis (R) and a circumference shaped as a polygonal prism (P) whose flat faces (L) are equipped with interchangeable dies (S) featuring twin recesses (G).

FIG. 2 schematically represents the routing of two webs of filter paper (F1, F2), fed out from their respective spools (B1, B2) and wrapped, one overlying the other, around the flat faces of the polygonal carousel (P).

FIG. 3 is an axonometric diagram showing the routing of the filter paper on the infeed (F1, F2) and ouffeed (F3) side.

FIG. 4 illustrates the execution, using means known to the art and hence not shown, of a first series of cuts (t) on the flat section (1) of the filter paper (F1).

FIG. 5 illustrates the execution of a second series of cuts in the second flat section (2) and a depression (G) in the central part of the flat section (1) obtained by means of a forming punch indicated by the arrow (M).

FIG. 6 illustrates the feeding of a predetermined dose (I) of product into the zone of the respective depression (C).

FIG. 7 illustrates the operation of a flat tamping punch (N′) for forming asymmetrical pods.

FIG. 7 bis, similar to FIG. 7, illustrates the operation of a concave tamping punch (N) for forming symmetrical pods.

FIG. 8 illustrates the arrival of the filter paper (F2), which is applied over the compacted dose.

FIG. 9 shows, on a duly enlarged scale, the greater flaring (W) of the cuts (t) during the action of the forming punch (M), which serves to obtain a deeper depression (C). It may be noted that the action of the flat tamping punch (N′) has compacted the entire dose flush with the face of the prism so as to create an asymmetrical pod. FIG. 9 b is, similar to FIG. 9, shows, on a duly enlarged scale, the lesser flaring (I) of the cuts (t) during the action of a forming punch (M) serving to obtain a shallower depression (C). It may be noted that the action of the concave tamping punch (N) has compacted the coffee so as to create a symmetrical pod.

FIG. 10 illustrates the configuration of the operating sequence for asymmetrical compacted pods.

FIG. 10 bis, similar to FIG. 10, refers to the operating sequence for producing symmetrical compacted pods.

FIG. 11 illustrates the operation of die cutting around the edge of the packaged pods.

FIG. 12 illustrates the separation of the asymmetrical pods (A) from the double layer of filter paper (F3).

FIG. 12 bis illustrates the separation of symmetrical pods (E).

FIG. 13 illustrates, on a duly enlarged scale, the separation of a type (A) asymmetrical flat-topped compacted pod.

FIG. 13 bis illustrates, on a duly enlarged scale, the separation of a type (E) symmetrical compacted pod.

FIG. 14 is an axonometric view of a type (A) asymmetrical flat-topped compacted pod.

FIG. 14 bis is an axonometric view of a symmetrical compacted pod (E).

FIG. 15 is a front view of an asymmetrical flat-topped compacted pod (A).

FIG. 15 bis a front view of a symmetrical compacted pod (E).

FIG. 16 shows the distribution, as seen from above, of a series of cuts (t) around the central zone of the flat face (L) of the prism (P).

FIG. 17 shows how the cuts are flared (I) to make symmetrical pods.

FIG. 18 shows how the cuts are flared to a greater degree (W) to make an asymmetrical flat-topped compacted pod, given the greater depth of the depression formed.

FIG. 19 schematically represents, in a cross-section view, the action of a forming punch (M), which is such as to lend the filter paper (F1) the deeper shape (C) required for the bottom half of a flat-topped pod.

FIG. 20 illustrates a dose of product being fed for packaging in a type (A) asymmetrical flat-topped pod.

FIG. 21 illustrates the action of a flat tamping punch (N′), which is such as to level out the dose of product in the depression (C) formed in the filter paper (F1) to create an asymmetrical pod.

FIG. 22 illustrates the sealing of a compacted asymmetrical pod with a flat filter paper top (F2).

FIGS. 19 bis, 20 bis, 21 bis and 22 bis are similar to FIGS. 19, 20, 21 and 22 and represent the action of a concave punch (N″), which is such as to increase the degree of compacting of the same dose of product to create a concave asymmetrical pod.

FIGS. 19 ter, 20 ter, 21 ter and 22 ter represent the action of a concave punch (N), which is such as to increase the degree of compacting of the same dose of product to create a symmetrical pod.

In the figures, the individual details are marked as follows:

A is a flat-topped compacted pod.

B1 is the spool of filter paper (F1).

B2 is the spool of filter paper (F2).

C is the depression formed in the filter paper (F1)

E is a compacted pod of standard shape and size.

F1 is the filter paper to be impressed with the forming punch (M).

F2 is the filter paper for creating the pods.

F3 indicates the overlaying of the two filter papers (F1, F2).

G indicates a recess directly impressed in the flat faces of the prism or the interchangeable dies (S).

L indicates the flat faces of the polygonal prism.

N indicates the tamping punch for the standard type of pods (E).

N′ indicates the tamping punch for type (A) compacted pods.

N″ indicates the convex tamping punch for type (A) pods.

P is the polygonal prism-shaped carousel.

R indicates the axis around which the carousel rotates intermittently.

t indicates the cuts on the filter paper (F1).

T indicates the flaring of the cuts (t).

W indicates a larger flaring of the cuts (t) to enable the formation of deeper recesses (C).

I, II, III, IV indicate the doses fed for packaging in pods.

1, 2, 3, 4 indicate an orderly sequence of sections where the filter paper will be flat during the pod packaging process.

The figures clearly evidence the compact structural architecture of the packaging machine to which the present invention relates. The invention naturally lends itself to different embodiments as regards both the dimensions and structural proportions of the various parts making up the packaging machine.

It is apparent that the number of sides of polygon may vary, as may the geometric proportions of the prismatic carousel.

It is likewise apparent that the number of recesses (G) and their distribution on the faces (L) of the prism may vary. The choice of cuts (t) will also be adapted to the depth of the depression required.

All the devices that are not illustrated are understood as being made using known systems and actuated with technological components known in the art. Therefore, the scope of the present invention shall encompass all packaging machines featuring the basic, original characteristics described and illustrated herein.

The technological choices that may optimise the functionality of the packaging machine of the present invention are: the number of sides of the polygon, the diameter of the polygonal wheel, the length of each side of the polygon, the width of the prism, the number of recesses (G) and their distribution on the faces of the prism, the distribution and size of the cuts (t), the proportions of the forming and tamping punches (M; N, N′, N″), the devices actuating the intermittent rotation of the wheel with a horizontal axis and the filling device for measuring out and dispensing the pre-established doses.

Now that the original innovative characteristics of the present invention have been made apparent, anyone with average skill in the art may construct filter paper pod packaging machines having the basic characteristics as described and illustrated in the following claims. 

1) A filter paper pod packaging machine characterised by the fact that it comprises a polygonal prismatic wheel (P) with an intermittently rotating horizontal axis (R), each flat face (L) of the prism (P) directly incorporating at least one recess (G) matching the size and shape of the pods to be produced. 2) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claim, characterised by the fact that each flat face (L) of the prism (P) may be equipped with interchangeable dies (S) featuring recesses (G) that geometrically match the size and shape of the pods to be produced. 3) The filter paper pod packaging machine of claims 1 or 2, characterised by the fact that by varying the length of each side of the polygon and by varying the width of each face of the prism it is possible to create a plurality of recesses (G) on each flat face (L) of the prism, either in a radial or axial configuration, in one or more rows. 4) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claims, characterised by the fact that a web of filter paper (F1), fed out from its respective spool (B1), and overlaid by a second web of filter paper (F2) fed out from its respective spool, is wrapped around the flat faces (L) of the polygonal prismatic wheel (P). 5) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claims, characterised by the fact that a series of cuts (t) are made in the flat filter paper (F1) in appropriate positions around the central zone corresponding to the recess (G) impressed in the prismatic wheel (P). 6) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claims, characterised by the fact that a forming punch (M) is applied on the web (F1) in the central zone surrounded by the cuts (t) to mould the web (F1) to the shape (C) of the recess (G), said moulding of the filter paper being optimised by the presence of cuts which flare out (T) to facilitate the formation of a depression in the filter paper web (F1) by action of the forming punch (M), while the peripheral zone of the filter paper (F1) remains flat and adherent to the face (L) of the prism (P). 7) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claims, characterised by the fact that the forming punch (M) creates a deeper recess (C) in the web (F1) by flaring the cuts (t) to a greater width (W), while the peripheral zone of the filter paper (F1) remains flat and adherent to the face (L) of the prism (P). 8) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claims, characterised by the fact that the greater depth of the recess (C) allows the pod to hold the same quantity of compacted product as symmetrical pods (E), the diameter being equal. 9) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claims, characterised by the fact that the recesses (G) feature holes (f) through which suction is applied to attract the filter paper (F1), thereby facilitating the moulding of the latter to a shape (C) matching that of the recess (G) during the operation of the forming punch (M). 10) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claims, characterised by the fact that the suction applied through the holes (f) in the recesses (G) remains on even after the forming punch (M) has completed its action in order to assure the adherence of the filter paper (F1) to the recesses (G) during subsequent processing. 11) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claims, characterised by the fact that the depression (C), obtained by the action of the forming punch (M) on the filter paper (F1), is filled with a pre-measured volume of product that will be compacted by means of a specific concave tamping punch (N) for producing symmetrical pods. 12) The filter paper pod packaging machine of the previous claims, characterised by the fact that the deeper depression (C), obtained by the action of the forming punch (M) on the filter paper (F1), is filled with a pre-measured volume of product that will be compacted by means of a specific flat tamping punch (N′) for producing asymmetrical pods and subsequently sealed with a flat top made from filter paper (F2) fixed onto the pod along the edges adherent to the faces (L) of the prismatic polygon (P). 13) Filter pod obtained with the packaging machine of the previous claims; characterised by the fact that being compacted and having a flat top it may be used to make an espresso of good quality with less coffee or an espresso of better quality with the same quantity of coffee. 